<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark McLaughlin Associates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk</link>
	<description>Chartered Tax Advisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Regulating Tax Advisers</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/397</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/397#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HMRC seems determined to adopt a ‘policing’ role in respect of tax agents. A further HMRC consultation document (‘Working with Tax Agents: The Next Stage’) was published with the Pre-Budget Report 2009.
There are two main categories of tax agents; those who are affiliated to a professional body, and those who are not. HMRC’s first consultation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/397/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Avoidance &#8216;Schemes&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/395</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/395#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is no secret that HMRC is taking a tougher line against tax avoidance. Indeed, there is a degree of openness about the type of tax planning arrangements that HMRC regards as unacceptable, or which are not considered to work as intended.
HMRC has an ‘Anti-avoidance Group’ section on its website, which sets out HMRC’s strategy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/395/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Associated Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/393</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/393#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When dealing with small and owner-managed companies, it can often be difficult to ascertain the number of associated companies.
For small companies relief purposes, the lower (£300,000) and upper (£1.5 million) ‘relevant maximum amounts’ are divided between active associated companies in the accounting period. The small companies’ rate of 21% applies to profits up to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/393/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing Share Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/391</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/391#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ability of companies to reduce share capital has been simplified following changes introduced in Companies Act 2006 from 1 October 2008.
The capital reduction procedure (in CA 2006, ss 641-657) was discussed in my article ‘Don’t wind me up’ (Taxation, 5 February 2009), in the context of winding up companies using Extra Statutory Concession C16.
As [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/391/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practice Update &#8211; January / February 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/387</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/387#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this edition of Practice Update:
1. Reducing share capital – The tax effect of the Companies Act 2006 procedure.
2. Associated companies – The rules for small companies’ relief purposes are about to get easier.
3. Regulating tax advisers – HMRC’s consultation on working with tax agents.
4. Tax avoidance schemes – HMRC’s online warnings about certain tax [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/387/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pension Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/350</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not uncommon for assets to be transferred to pension schemes instead of cash. However, are assets an acceptable form of pension contribution to a registered scheme for tax relief purposes?
HMRC guidance categorically states in the context of employer contributions: “In-specie contributions are not allowed. The legislation only permits monetary contributions” (RPSM05102035).
However, the same [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/350/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partnership Profit Shares</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/333</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/333#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retrospective tax planning would be a wonderful thing in many cases. For example, it would potentially be very useful if partnership profit shares could be adjusted after the year end based on the personal circumstances of the individual partners, particularly in the context of partnerships involving family members.
However, is retrospective tax planning involving the allocation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/333/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practice Update Newsletter &#8211; November / December 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/327</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this edition of Practice Update:
1. Beating The 50% Tax Rate? – What are the planning possibilities for unincorporated businesses?
2. Partnership Profit Shares – Is there any scope for flexibility?
3. IHT: Transferable Nil Rate Band – When living together could beat getting married
4. Tax Relief For Pension Contributions – ‘In specie’ contributions of assets.
Download version [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/327/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transferable Nil Rate Band</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/324</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/324#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The introduction of the Inheritance Tax (IHT) transferable nil rate band facility in Finance Act 2008 has made life much easier for married couples (and civil partners) in terms of enabling the nil rate band to be utilised on the first death.
In certain circumstances, up to four nil rate bands may be available. For example, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/324/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Dividend Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/319</link>
		<comments>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/319#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent changes
Accountants and tax advisers who were familiar with the concept that a dividend paid by one UK company to another UK company was not generally liable to corporation tax will need to think again, following legislation introduced in Finance Act 2009.
Bad news or good news?
Under the new rules, the basic position is that all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markmclaughlin.co.uk/index.php/archives/319/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
